Independent Office for Police Conduct

(Formally the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) and previously the Police Complaints Authority (PCA)

 

Harvey – v – Northumbria Police

Successful representation for a client after compiling a dossier of complaints on his behalf for the Police Complaints Authority (PCA); the complaint alleged that a detective constable of the Northumbria Police had conspired with a police informer to plant drugs and a firearm on the premises of a Newcastle businessman. The officer was disciplined and fined.

 

International Cases

 

Federal Tax Authorities (Germany) – v – Vasiliki Mari

Successful representation and conclusion for clients who sought to illegally exchange 500 million Greek Euros into German Euros. At the time they were being monitored by three intelligence agencies from Spain, Germany and Greece.

 

POCA Cases

 

Moulden – v – the Crown

Successful representation for a client suspected of money laundering and the confiscation of his assets in a sum of £750,000. Client retained his property and assets after a three day hearing at Leeds Crown Court.

 

Jennings – v – the Crown

Successful conclusion for a client who sought to vary a restraint order based on material I had previously compiled detailing his ultimate beneficial ownership of a trust. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash held in an offshore account.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 3)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 4)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 5)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Derbah – v – the Crown (case 6)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Charni – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Charni – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Liversage – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Liversage – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Liversage – v – the Crown (case 3)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Pratt – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Wheway – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Smith – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Smith – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Kenth – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash, property and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Fletcher – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Daniels – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Holmes – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Holmes – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

De-Groote – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Eyre – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Arabskyj – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Clinton – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

 Vaughan – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Reiner – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Whittle – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Fagge – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Peckham – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Boinnard – v – the Crown (case 1)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Boinnard – v – the Crown (case 2)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Boinnard – v – the Crown (case 3)

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Jordan – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Williams – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Cox – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Wilson – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Le-Cornu – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Starling – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership of an offshore company. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Biscayne International Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

C.F. International Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Camrose Properties Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Castledale Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Cedar Grove International Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Charnley Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Global Venture Finance Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Golden Trading Marker Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Goundry International – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Halliday Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Hazelwood International Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Hillstar Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Hollymount Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Lazy Wave Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Mountain View Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Rainsford Trading Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Silverlock Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Appledene Trading Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Caoimhling Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Cavella Properties Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Clayton Worldwide Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

UK Technology Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Easthope Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Interkey Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Primecraft Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Bartholomew Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Philip James Investments Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Nutech Finance Group Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Fleet Securities Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.

 

Elite Vacaciones 2001 Limited – v – the Crown

Successful representation and conclusion for a client’s offshore company based on material I had previously compiled detailing their ultimate beneficial ownership. This was disputed by the Crown who sought to confiscate cash and/or assets held offshore.